Reader & writer 1st DJ 2nd.
I am a certified schizophrenic, I was sectioned in 2012 for 2 months. Prior to my section I had a severe mental breakdown in 2006 and 2007 from which I will never fully recover (the section helped though). I am mentally disabled, I see things in a purple haze and I hear voices, however, I am not stupid. Due to visual and auditory hallucinations and severe anxiety I cannot work, however, please do not judge me or my work because I am a schizophrenic. I am alright. I do not waste my time. I have read just about everyday since the 1st of August 2016 (mostly history), therefore I am kind of a self taught QBE academic, in that I have independently read well over 100 books and I have wrote a 31k word essay titled life relativity (time 4 forgiveness). I have also conducted an unorthodox study or investigation of T² or https://timerelativity.com, which is mathematical time or relativity. Hence, I am trying to understand or balance time and relativity with the spiritual and divine. I am also trying balance or mix the scientific or academic with the cool and fashionable or music and DJing. What is time? Is it light? Is it energy? Is it fundamental divinity? What is the spiritual and the divine? All I know is that the spiritual and divine are acataleptic (not understandable) and therefore, require faith or belief, whereas time and Albert Einstein do not! My DJ name primitive or archaic innocence is one half of life relativity. I was born in 1981 and from 1985 I grew up in between three locations, Easington Colliery in County Durham, England, a gold mining town called Obuasi in the Ashanti region of Ghana, West Africa and a boarding school (Barnard Castle School) also in County Durham. My family has a mining heritage. My ancestors worked the collieries in the north of England, with only my father raising the game to gold mining in 1985, when he started work for Ashanti Goldfields Corporation (AGC) in Ghana, West Africa. Most importantly I am a QBE academic, I have Bachelor of Arts degree, but I have no specific qualifications to make https://liferelativity.com orthodox other than my experience of Africa and that I have independently read over 100 books to research the essay.
This website is a secondary objective of a general and independent study of time and relativity, the other works are life relativity and DJ relativity (see menu). Primitive or archaic innocence is also my DJ name. However, life relativity is the main objective. Time relativity is the simplest form of mathematical time or relativity, however, it’s main purpose is just to contrast and support life relativity which is writing or essay time. There is nothing in these websites that is not ultimately credited to Albert Einstein! By this I mean that the relativity of life relativity would not work without Albert Einstein’s theory, as in time and the terms relative and relatively would be meaningless without it. If life relativity is in any way theoretical then that theory is just relativity and hence all of it belongs to Professor Einstein. Life relativity is not a broad field or even a branch of relativity, but it is hoped it could be a ‘twig’ of relativity. I am only hoping to propose that there is a case for a life relativity.
Albert Einstein requires no faith!
Siddhartha Gautama Buddha and Jesus Christ were ancient and primitive men, but what does that tell us? It tells us that you do not need to be modern and advanced to be eternally relative or relevant like perpetual teenagers that never date or go out of fashion. You can be primitive. No matter how high and advanced we get ultimately we are all beaten by two ancient and primitive men. How? It must be relative? I have removed all references to the spiritual and divine in https://relativityoflife.com as I want it to be acceptable to the scientific community. Although I have become secular and scientific I have not lost faith in the spiritual. This must be the third or fourth time that I have deliberately avoided the divine, and purely pursued time and relativity. However, it dawned on me that https://liferelativity.com does not work without at least acknowledging the Buddha and Jesus Christ, hence I would now like to state that I believe in the Buddha and Jesus Christ, but I understand Albert Einstein. The only difference is that Albert Einstein requires no faith! Why does life relativity require us to acknowledge the divine? We can say things like it was relatively no problem for Homo antecessor to cannibalise compared to Jeffrey Dahmer because H. antecessor was so primitive and innocent in that they had no infrastructure, military, police, emergency services or medicine etc and because they came from such a long time ago. Therefore, why isn’t relativity and time enough? Because relativity and time can determine if you are innocent and deserve forgiveness isn’t relativity and time therefore ethics?
Time is not spiritual or divine.
To reiterate I am working on or developing three things https://timerelativity.com, https://liferelativity.com and https://djrelativity.com. The first two works are both related to time, however, the former is mathematical time where as the latter is writing or essay time. Primitive innocence is also my DJing name. What I mean by writing or essay time is that life relativity and primitive innocence are just literature and simply use the terms time, relative and relatively. As T² does not prove anything scientifically that is not already known, therefore, both works together are just an independent and general study of time and relativity. I have learned that other than “being ahead” there is not much in the mathematical time where as there is ethics, innocence and forgiveness in writing or essay time. When I first studied T², I lost all faith in the spiritual and divine (for the first time) and after toing and froing, back and forth I now believe this is not right. Because I was studying https://timerelativity.com I stated rational things like:
“Time is not spiritual or divine.”
“Do not seek spiritual enlightenment, seek time intellectually.”
”Never listen to electronic beats, all you need is a ticking clock.”
I believe in the top two statements however, I definitely do not now believe the third, as DJing and music are beautiful and hip in a way that science and academia can never be, which are dry and ugly in comparison.
With DJing I make no effort to be fashionable as I am a 39 year old dinosaur and because I read and write a lot my DJ style is more like educational DJing. My DJing is in a ‘realist style’, ‘geek style’ or ‘square style’. I am trying to balance or mix the scientific or academic with the cool and fashionable or music and DJing. When it comes to fashion think of me as more of a historian DJ than a supercool DJ. To help explain my DJ style, consider the following scenario. Scientists and academics are not fashionable compared to DJs, however, what if scientists or academics did like trance music and did want to DJ? If you want a truly ‘Cosmic Gate’ or ‘Solarstone’ or if you want the Ibizan club ‘Space’ to truly live up to its name, why not experiment and ask a scientist to DJ? The sound and light engineering of events and clubs are just science, in fact all the technology that goes into events and clubs is just science, so why then rely on psychedelia or the spiritual and divine? Scientists make clubbing happen. If scientists created a club what would it look like? What would a ‘scientific club’s’ posters, flyers and graphic designs look like? They would probably consist of black holes, galaxies and supernovae etc, as opposed to psychedelic or spiritual trance designs. What is graphic design anyway? Do scientists really need graphic design? They would also probably use real space and time in that the gig or club opening doors might have a certain precise date and time, at which one had to be punctual and ‘be there or B²’. Hence, the ‘realist style’, ‘geek style’ or ‘square style’ of my DJ name. To reiterate, DJing and music are cool, beautiful and hip in a way that science and academia can never be, which are dry and ugly in comparison. However, can we not unite beauty with brains? Therefore, my DJ name is never fashionable but is a ‘realist style’, ‘geek style’ or ‘square style’. My actual goal is just to educate people about life relativity (time for forgiveness), hence, I only use DJing to help spread the word. If you like you can listen to my mixes here.
Equations v literature.
There is no ethics in scientific or mathematical time, however, there is ethics, innocence and forgiveness in writing or essay time. To demonstrate, modern crimes are relatively evil as compared to the deeds of prehistoric men, such as murder and cannibalism etc, which were relatively less of an issue for prehistoric man because they were so primitive and innocent in that they had no technology, infrastructure or medicine etc, and also because they came from such a long time ago. Also for example, when I first studied https://timerelativity.com I said that if you want to say something, say it with mathematics, formulas and equations not with writing. However, the only problem with mathematics and physics is that although you can fundamentally command people with formulas and equations, you do not get to choose what you want to say, they are actually utterly neutral and devoid of any ethical content. Therefore, we have absolutely no hope for forgiveness (particularly to do with the Holocaust) with mathematics and physics. Hence, although literature does not command people in the same way as equations and formulas, it has ethical content and can forgive.
Square of time formula:
A = BT²
B = A/T²
T² = A/B
A = small magnitude time length
B = large magnitude time length
T² = small time magnitude square
Notice how A = BT² formula coincidentally matches E = MC² formula. Like I said all of this belongs to Albert Einstein.
What is square of time?
Square of time is CAPITAL T².
Not small t!
Small t is a length or a dimension.
CAPITAL T or T² is a magnitude of time, not a dimension.
Although I have no other experience T or T² seems to me the best way to understand time. It is certainly the simplest.
The point of orders of magnitude.
Why does a square of time exist? Surely it would not exist without orders of magnitude? There is no better way to use orders of magnitude of time than with square of time or maths and time. It gives them an excellent use. What else is the point of orders of magnitude for time?
What is the point of square time?
Square of time is relativity for laypeople like me, how else can laypeople like me genuinely practice, perform or exercise any form of relativity? Special and general relativity are too advanced. I am clueless! I mean I have never heard of any simple exercises with E = MC² that laypeople like me can practice, however, there are literally infinite exercises of A = BT². You can work with any time you like such as Mayan time or Martian time. Square of time is also “ahead” because the mathematics and formulas are very quick and they are always one step “ahead” of you, therefore, you have to think one step “ahead” in order to workout the questions.
First of all, the obvious connection between them is time. Secondly, there is no ethics in scientific relativity such as E = MC² and nuclear energy etc, in fact there is obviously even no ethics in simple maths and time relativity such as T², however there is ethics and even forgiveness in life relativity.
How is life linked to relativity? What is life relativity and primitive innocence?
Ask yourself one question: Do you want primitive innocence? I bet I know your answer. Yes! Everybody, indeed every being and creature since life started wants it. In fact if it could even the very first single celled life form would want primitive innocence. Primitive innocence is life itself. It doesn’t matter what race, creed or religion you are, we all want it, even Africans want it, indeed what else are Africans if not primitive innocence? Everybody understands what is meant by the old sayings “innocent times” or “innocent days”, hence, life relativity and primitive innocence take this notion very far indeed. Life relativity is time for forgiveness on two levels, first of all it is quite literally time for forgiveness and second of all it is definitely about time for forgiveness! LR and PI are the theory that things were better relatively in the past. They are also are time and relativity for grown ups but never geniuses. This is because obviously we cannot teach such subjects as Adolf Hitler and Jeffrey Dahmer to children. Also there obviously has to be forgiveness for anything in the afterlife, including the Holocaust, and this is because people in the afterlife are grown up! What are life relativity and primitive innocence? They are ethics or ethical relativity, in that they deal with the genuine forgiveness of serious criminals such as genocidal megalomaniacs, cannibals and pedophiles. They are certain undeniable and self evident truths or axioms. Why and how is primitivism linked to innocence? The answer is that the further you go back in time the more primitive life was and animals (such as humans) were, therefore the more innocent they were relatively. Also the more advanced you are the more responsible you are and therefore the less innocent you are, therefore, the more primitive you are the less responsible you are and therefore the more innocent you are. To shorten it the less the more the more the less! For example in the 1980s we had no internet or mobile phones, we did not even have satellite TV, just 4 channel terrestrial TV and we still used the Yellow Pages, newspaper TV guides and coal fires etc therefore we were much more primitive and innocent in the 1980s than today. To reiterate in the 1980s we did not understand smart technologies such as FaceTime and Spotify, therefore we were much more primitive and innocent in the 1980s than the 2020s. If you cannot remember the days before the internet and mobile phones or FaceTime and Spotify then you are much more advanced and therefore less innocent. In the 1980s we could only imagine that a video call would be something like out of Star Trek or the Aliens films, we had no idea it would just be an app called ‘FaceTime’. This is primitive innocence! And music to us was simply cassette tapes, we could not even imagine that one day music would be ‘streamed’ over the internet, in fact we would not have even understood what you meant by ‘streamed’ or the internet. This is primitive innocence! I even remember when compact discs or CDs came out, we were all amazed by them, we never really thought it would get any better. This is primitive innocence! Therefore, imagine how primitive and innocent Victorian, medieval, ancient and prehistoric people were! Prehistoric people were so primitive and innocent they could literally get away with rape, murder and cannibalism etc. How is crime relative? Crimes and sins are relative in that for example cannibalism was relatively no issue with such as Homo antecessor because Homo antecessor was so primitive and innocent because they had no infrastructure, technology or medicine etc and because Homo antecessor came from such a distant time or epoch, therefore, killing and cannibalism were relatively less of an issue for them. However, therefore, murder and cannibalism today by such as Jeffrey Dahmer was so relatively evil compared with Homo antecessor because they are out of place and in the wrong time. Therefore, for the sins we do not like to forgive, for example serial killers, the way to forgive them is to use life relativity and primitive innocence and to call them prehistoric man, primitive or animals. Because Jeffrey Dahmer was a cannibal in the 20th century, therefore the only thing he can be or equate to is a prehistoric man such as Homo antecessor or an animal. To reiterate, because Jeffrey Dahmer equated to a prehistoric man such as H. antecessor in the 20th century, this means he was relatively in the wrong place and the wrong time, therefore he was anachronistic and therefore he was relatively evil. He would have to have fur to have forgiveness. With fur and with these creatures or in this place and time he might be at ease, forgiven and accepted. If he accepted this then his sins would be lighter. There is nothing as humble as giving yourself fur or making yourself an animal. He lived in a brick residence and did his shopping at a supermarket, therefore, he was advanced and more responsible, and therefore less innocent than Homo antecessor for murder and cannibalism. To reiterate the only way I can understand a serial killer such as Jeffrey Dahmer with any lightness is if he had fur and were a prehistoric man such as Homo antecessor. Therefore, if Jeffrey Dahmer did not try to be advanced, special or superior to animals and instead became, thought like, acted or accepted that he was primitive, prehistoric or even animal, would we forgive him? If Jeffrey Dahmer went back in time hundreds or tens of thousands of years to a more primitive period could he have “relative innocence”? Don’t call him a cannibal call him a “cannibal in the 20th century.” Can you un-evolve? Yes! If you commit a serious crime such as Jeffrey Dahmer then you will un-evolve as you will need to go back in time to the required period in order seek forgiveness and acceptance or “relative innocence“. See Question 25.
What has relativity got to do with crime?
Time! Crime and sin are relative, because greed, theft, rape, child molestation, murder and cannibalism were relatively no sweat with primitive animals and prehistoric man, this is because prehistoric man was primitive and old, in that he had no infrastructure, technology or medicine etc and that he came from a much more ancient and different time period. For example, slavery was relatively more acceptable in the ancient and medieval periods. Therefore, the only issue with modern crimes is that they are anachronistic, in that they are out of place or in the wrong time, this is why they are so relatively evil compared to the sins of prehistoric man such as Homo antecessor. Also obviously there is the connection that criminals have to serve time in prison for their crimes or sins. For example, if Adolf Hitler went back in time millions or hundreds of thousands of years to a more primitive period could he have “relative innocence”? See Question 24.
How can you travel back in time?
Time travel (reference).
Because the further you go back in time, the harsher and more primitive and innocent life was, time travel, (specifically time travel to the distant past such as the Lower Palaeolithic period) is explained below with the excuse of attaining relative innocence and forgiveness. Relativity is all about reference, in that speed or velocity always have two parameters, a distance covered and an elapsed time, as in miles per hour. If you are travelling on a train at 100 miles per hour, this speed is relative to the earth which is your reference. However, if you took your reference from the sun the speed of the train would look very different as the earth is also moving around the sun at a much higher velocity. Also the sun is moving around the centre of the Milky Way galaxy at an even higher velocity and the galaxies are also moving relative to one another. It depends where you look from as to how fast the train is travelling. Also two events that appear simultaneous to one observer can appear to happen at different times to another observer. For example, imagine if the sun and Alpha centauri suddenly exploded at exactly the same time. Because light is not instant, but takes time to travel, the observer on earth would see the sun explode after 8 minutes and Aplha centauri after 4 and a half years. However, a spacecraft half way between the sun and Alpha centauri would see both explosions simultaneously. Both reference frames are valid! Returning back to the train, if there was another train travelling at 80 miles per hour and in the same direction as your train, then you are only travelling at 20 miles per hour relative to the second train, which is your reference. The speed of light behaves differently, in that like the two trains, if you could travel in a spacecraft in the same direction as rays of light, the speed of light relative to you should be the speed light minus the speed of the spacecraft. But it is never like this! The speed of light is always the same relative to you no matter how fast you are travelling. The speed of light is absolute, and is the same in all frames of reference. How does reference relate to life relativity? Time is our frame of reference, in that from or in the Lower Palaeolithic frame of reference such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile seem relatively less evil. But from or in the 20th or 21st centuries frames of reference they do seem very evil. To reiterate, relative to Homo antecessor in the Lower Palaeolithic frame of reference who had no technology, infrastructure, military, emergency services or medicine etc, Jeffrey Dahmer was relatively less innocent because he did have all these technologies, amenities and infrastructures etc and because he practiced cannibalism in the wrong place and wrong time. Although they are not in different places Homo antecessor and Jeffrey Dahmer are both in their respective and different time periods. To attempt to explain time travel, let’s consider time periods as places or time as a kind of speed, distance or length. For example, imagine if Homo antecessor was travelling on a train at 20 miles per hour relative to the earth which represents the Lower Palaeolithic frame of reference and Jeffrey Dahmer was travelling parallel and in the same direction on a train at 100 miles per hour relative to the earth, which represents the 20th century frame of reference. Relative to the Homo antecessor or the Lower Palaeolithic, the Jeffrey Dahmer’s train seems to be travelling at 80 miles per hour and seems very fast indeed. However, imagine if we could travel in time and bring the two time periods much closer together in distance or speed, so that Jeffrey Dahmer’s train or 20th century frame of reference slowed down to 20 miles per hour. Now the two frames of reference are at rest with respect to each other and each seem to be standing still relative to each other. It’s reference and perspective. Or we could say that you were on the 100 mile per hour train in the 20th century frame of reference and Jeffrey Dahmer was on the 20 mile per hour train in the Lower Palaeolithic. Relative to you Jeffrey Dahmer seems to be travelling backwards at 80 mile per hour and seems very fast. However, if I could get you to travel in time or to slow down to 20 miles per hour and join the Lower Palaeolithic frame of reference, now you and Jeffrey Dahmer are at rest with respect to each other and each seem to be standing still relative to each other. No longer does Jeffrey Dahmer seem to be travelling backward very fast. Speed is relative but what if like speed innocence and forgiveness were also relative? To reiterate, from the Lower Palaeolithic frame of reference, such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile seem relatively less evil. This seems contradictory but it is not. Relative to the Lower Palaeolithic period, Jeffrey Dahmer in the 20th century seems relatively very evil, however, if Jeffrey Dahmer could go back in time to or close to the Lower Palaeolithic period, then in or from this frame of reference Jeffrey Dahmer would seem relatively much less evil. Also relative to my grandfather who was born in the 1920s frame of reference, who received “an apple and an orange and a penny in a stocking” for Christmas, I am less innocent because I was born in 1981 and received anything I wanted for Christmas, for example an Atari, a Commodore 64, an Amiga or a Nintendo etc. And those born in the 2000s are less innocent than me from the 1980s frame of reference because they cannot remember the days before the internet, mobile phones, FaceTime and Spotify etc. Therefore, for the sins we do not like to forgive, for example serial killers, the way to forgive them is to use life relativity and primitive innocence and to call them prehistoric man, primitive or animals. Because Jeffrey Dahmer was a cannibal in the 20th century, therefore the only thing he can be or equate to is a prehistoric man such as Homo antecessor or an animal. To reiterate, because Jeffrey Dahmer equated to a prehistoric man such as H. antecessor in the 20th century, this means he was relatively in the wrong place and the wrong time, therefore he was anachronistic and therefore he was relatively evil. He would have to have fur to have forgiveness. With fur and with these creatures or in this place and time he might be at ease, forgiven and accepted. If he accepted this then his sins would be lighter. There is nothing as humble as giving yourself fur or making yourself an animal. Jeffrey Dahmer had no compassion, therefore he was an anachronistic prehistoric hominin in the 20th century. He lived in a brick residence and did his shopping at a supermarket, therefore, he was advanced and more responsible, and therefore less innocent than Homo antecessor for murder and cannibalism. To reiterate the only way I can understand a serial killer such as Jeffrey Dahmer with any lightness is if he had fur and were a prehistoric man such as Homo antecessor. Therefore, if Jeffrey Dahmer did not try to be advanced, special or superior to animals and instead became, thought like, acted or accepted that he was primitive, prehistoric or even animal, would we forgive him? If Jeffrey Dahmer went back in time hundreds or tens of thousands of years to a more primitive period could he have “relative innocence”? Don’t call him a cannibal call him a “cannibal in the 20th century.” Can you un-evolve? Yes! If you commit a serious crime such as Jeffrey Dahmer then you will un-evolve as you will need to go back in time to the required period in order seek forgiveness and acceptance or “relative innocence“. Our reference should always be prehistory or prehistoric man. For example, if you have hit your father, or slapped your wife, or if you are serving time for minor crimes such as ABH or burglary etc, as will be seen, if we can forgive Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile, then relatively, who cares? The above explanation might indicate that the trivial matter of time travel to the past may only be possible in order to seek relative innocence and forgiveness. Maybe you have got to have a valid reason to time travel? Anyway, I am sure time travel is possible in the afterlife, but why not down here in life or on earth? Perhaps you can spiritually or mentally? You can find out more about what my DJ name (primitive innocence) means here.
FUCK THE FUTURE.
Finally, even primitives such as prehistoric man understood small t which is normal counting as in basic numbers like 3 apples or 3 apples times 10 equals 30 apples and 3 apples divided by 10 equals 0.3 of an apple. However, similar to the speed of light, counting time behaves differently, with CAPITAL T², 3, 30 and 0.3 are exactly the same. (And 3 could potentially equal anything else for that matter).
A very simple example:
t = 3 seconds (s)
T^1 = 10 ds
T^2 = (3 × 10) / (3 / 10) = 10² = 100 ds²
A = 3 × 10 = 30 deciseconds (ds)
B = 3 / 10 = 0.3 decaseconds (das)
Note how 30, 3 and 0.3 (A, t and B) are all the same length of time, just different magnitudes. It is as if real time or relative time is never actually divided into say 30 deciseconds or 3 seconds as it is also 0.3 of a decasecond. Time is therefore whole, one, eternal, relative and a magnitude. Obviously it’s known that time is a magnitude, but I have never heard it said before that “time is not dimension, it is only a magnitude”, I have always been told that time is the fourth dimension or a kind of dimension or kind of a length, however, this investigation shows that real time is never a length or a dimension, it is only a magnitude. For such a simple formula, I am surprised that it is not very common knowledge indeed. Why didn’t I know? For example, 3 s (seconds) is also obviously 30 ds (deciseconds) and 0.3 das (decaseconds), however, the difference between 30 ds and 0.3 das is a square of the order magnitude of time as in 100 ds² and this is T². You could also say that 3 m (metres) is also obviously 30 dm (decimetres) and 0.3 dam (decametres), and, the difference between 30 dm and 0.3 dam is a square of the order magnitude of length as in 100 dm² and this is L². However, when you multiply 3 apples by 10 you get 30 apples, not 3 apples divided into 30 smaller pieces. And when you divide 3 apples by 10 you get 0.3 of a single apple, not 0.3 of a giant apple. In physics time is called a scalar quantity as opposed to a vector quantity, but it gets advanced quickly, where as to understand time properly, even a child can do it with T².
You need a calculator that converts decimals to fractions to practice mathematics and time. I recommend the Natural Scientific Calculator.
Occasionally a very powerful calculator is needed to calculate long numbers. PCalc is recommended.
There are just a few very simple things you need to know to practice maths and time. You can learn them all in seconds.
As in attosecond (as) and exasecond (Es) etc. The above link is used for quick reference.
As in 2.3855886103 × 10^13
For ease of writing and although unorthodox:
X = 2.3855886103
3. Understood k.
The unit of time is always the number plus the decimal. We will take minutes (m) for an example:
m = 65/4 = 16.25
k is always the whole number part of the unit of time in question, (as opposed to the whole number plus the decimal or just the decimal) and although unorthodox, k is an ‘understood k’ in that it is the k of the unit of time being subtracted k or the k of the decimal being added k. Taking the above example using minutes (m):
k = 16
The division is always the decimal part of the unit of time for example again using the minutes (m) example above:
s/60 = 1/4 or 0.25
m = k + s/60 = 16 + 0.25 = 65/4 = 16.25
A typical example:
s/60 = 1/4
s/60 is the decimal of minutes.
k = m – s/60 = 16
This means that the whole minutes (k) equals minutes (m) minus the decimal of minutes (s/60). Note k is usually chosen by you at will or at random.
m = k + s/60 = 65/4 = 16.25
This mean that minutes (m) equals whole minutes (k) plus the decimal of minutes (s/60).
Another example with days (d) and hours (h), let’s say:
d = 82319/3456
h/24 = d – k = 2831/3456
This means that the decimal of days (h/24) equals days (d) minus whole days (k). Note how d – k is another way to say h/24.
h = (d – k) × 24 = 2831/144
This means that hours (h) equals days (d) minus whole days (k) multiplied by 24. As noted above d – k is another way to say h/24, therefore (d – k) times 24 equals h. Note how the unit of time (h) is encoded in the decimal (h/24) of the previous unit of time (d).
k = h – m/60 = 19
This means that whole hours (k) equals hours (h) minus the decimal of hours (m/60).
As in when you multiply two exponents you add the exponents.
X × 10^13 × 10^6 = X × 10^19
And when you divide two exponents you subtract the exponents.
X × 10^6 / 10^13 = X × 10^-7
That is about it!
A simple example of a square of time:
(ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE AND EXPONENTS)
B = A/T^2 = X × 10^4 Ms
Note: the only clue in the above problem is the unit of time, as in megaseconds (Ms).
Therefore, what are the magnitudes of T^1, T^-1, T^2 and T^-2?
What are the powers n of X × 10^n for A and t?
T^1 = √(A/B) = 10^6 μs
T^-1 = √(B/A) = 10^-6 Ms
T^2 = A/B = 10^12 μs²
T^-2 = B/A = 10^-12 Ms²
A = BT^2 = X × 10^4 × 10^12 = X × 10^16 μs
t = A/T^1 = X × 10^16 / 10^6 = X × 10^10 s
It is a square of time!
Note: square of time is all about the exponents.
Click here for more complex questions.
It is not a waste of time.